Template:Did you know nominations/Qaem 100 (rocket)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 15:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Qaem 100 (rocket)
- ... that Iranian's fist three-stage satellite carrier, Qaem 100, successfully passed its suborbital test? Source: Tasnim News - in Persian
- Reviewed: Exchange Hotel, Montgomery
Created by Hosortyr (talk). Nominated by Mhhossein (talk) at 06:19, 12 November 2022 (UTC).
Article is new, and just big enough. No copyright problems detected. Tome is OK, but article is slightly POV as it misses out on some important info in the references, which is that Iran claims it is not for nuclear weapon delivery despite claims by other countries. All parts are fully cited.- Hook is not super exciting and I was not so clear what satellite carrier meant, is it a company or a truck? So perhaps we need a link. The hook is sufficiently short and is in article and referenced. Correct people credited, and QPQ performed. @Mhhossein: Do you want to propose a variant of the hook with a link or more excitement, so that I can approve? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:14, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you Graeme Bartlett for the review. Do you like the following hook?
- alt1 ... that Iran's first three-stage satellite carrier, Qaem 100, successfully passed its suborbital test? Source: Tasnim News (in Persian) and Tehran Times
- --Mhhossein talk 07:56, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
OK, that link makes it clear. So I will mark this ready. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you Graeme Bartlett for the review. Do you like the following hook?
- I'll promote this is a moment, but I do want to suggest that the article be moved to Qaem 100. No need for the parenthetical disambiguation in the title. I'm not sure how that will affect the DYK process, so I'll leave it to somebody else to worry about. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:36, 15 November 2022 (UTC)