Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Province of Cremona

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by sst 05:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Province of Cremona

[edit]
  • ... that sixteenth century irrigation channels assist in the production of rice in the Province of Cremona in northern Italy?

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:15, 5 October 2015 (UTC).

Nice expansion, good sources. I am sorry I don't find Cremona in the book given, nor rice, please explain. To me, the ALT would be nothing new, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: Maybe you looked at a different source? I see the information on rice and canals, mentioning the Province of Cremona, on page 145 of the source (ref 8). I think both hooks are interesting because the cultivation of rice is not what I would have expected to happen in northern Italy. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 16:59, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for explaining, - I looked at ref 5, because of the 16th century, which I don't see in ref 8, - can you help me again. What did you think risotto is made from if not locally grown rice? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Good point, but I associate the growing of rice with paddy-fields in tropical locations. We don't grow it here in Wales! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Now where do I find the ref for the more intriguing 16th century canals in the province? Will be off all day, travelling, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
That's ref 5: "By 1530, a network of ancillary canals and waterways covered the Lombardy Plain from Milan to Pavia." If you don't find that convincing, lets just go with ALT1. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
keep simple, unless you want to mention the music-making instead. Offline sources accepted AGF, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)