Template:Did you know nominations/Prison Fatal (2000)
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Prisión Fatal (2000)
[edit]( )
- ...that at the 2000 Prisión Fatal professional wrestling show tag team partners Rody and Burley were forced to wrestle each other, with Rody losing both the match and his wrestling mask?
- Reviewed: Michelle Tisseyre
Created by MPJ-DK (talk). Self-nominated at 15:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC).
- No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 02:00, 02 July 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 5345 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely (0.0% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- Some overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 178 characters
- ✗ MPJ-DK has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.
- ✗ Template:Did you know nominations/Michelle Tisseyre appears to have been used as QPQ for Template:Did you know nominations/70 IWRG DYKs, Template:Did you know nominations/Prison Fatal (2000)
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note to reviewer I had originally submitted this as part of a 70-DYK submission. After a comunity discussion it was agreed it would be better to withdraw that one and put up smaller hooks. The QPQ was originally listed on the 70-DYK page but since it never went to the main page it was never "spent" if you will. MPJ-DK 23:53, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- No glaring issues to me after giving it the once-over (new enough, long enough, interesting and cited hook, QPQ), though again, you do need to pay attention to copyediting (which I've done here). That's something I've noticed now on several occasions — odd typos and spelling errors. Raymie (t • c) 05:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)