Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Preorbital gland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 20:10, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Preorbital gland

[edit]

Hirola (Damaliscus hunteri) are often referred to as the "four-eyed antelope", due to their large preorbital glands

  • ... that due to its large preorbital glands, the hirola (Damaliscus hunteri) is often referred to as the "four-eyed antelope"?

Created/expanded by DiverDave (talk). Self nom at 01:43, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

  • Hook is 243 characters long by my count. Other than that: New enough. More than enough prose (great job!). Checked hook: a bit obscure, but is in the references. Checked refs 4, 6, and 10: no copyvio. I'm a little concerned that the first paragraph of "In Cervids" could be WP:Close paraphrasing, but this is not a clear problem.
Suggested ALT hook ... that due to its large preorbital glands, the hirola (Damaliscus hunteri) is often referred to as the "four-eyed antelope"?
hike395 (talk) 07:45, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments, hike395. I have substituted your shorter hook. With respect to your other comment---the text of the original source is quite clear and concise, and conveys the point very well. I have done my best to reword this paragraph, but it has not been easy. DiverDave (talk) 14:57, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

The article is just about the preorbital gland. I think the material is only tangential to the article. I removed it, leaving only the fact that deer like to rub their preorbital gland. OK with you? —hike395 (talk) 15:31, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Looks fine. Thank you! DiverDave (talk) 15:40, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Everything fine now. Thanks for the well-crafted article! —hike395 (talk) 15:47, 27 May 2012 (UTC)