Template:Did you know nominations/Pre-Maori settlement of New Zealand theories
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of Pre-Maori settlement of New Zealand theories's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 09:56, 23 February 2013 (UTC).
Pre-Maori settlement of New Zealand theories
[edit]- Reviewed: Not necessary, not a self nom
- Reviewed: Not necessary, not a self nom
Created by Trinder1 (talk), Kleinzach (talk). Nominated by Crisco 1492 (talk) at 08:54, 14 February 2013 (UTC).
- This article is new enough and long enough. I have removed the word "Vikings" from the hook as, though they are mentioned in the article lead (unreferenced), they are not mentioned in the body of the article. I am also editing the article to remove this uncited claim (the author of the article has been blocked indefinitely). Otherwise, the hook fact is well referenced.Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:34, 23 February 2013 (UTC)