Template:Did you know nominations/Possession (Joywave album)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Feminist (talk) 04:12, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
For March 13
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Possession (Joywave album)
- ... that Joywave's third album Possession incorporates samples of audio from the Voyager Golden Record into its songs? Source: axs.com — "Possession takes its cover art and some audio samples from the Voyager's Golden Record"
- Reviewed: Road Rash (video game)
- Comment: Would it be possible at all to have this DYK hook, if approved, appear during the album's release day (March 13)?
Converted from a redirect by Aria1561 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:02, 16 January 2020 (UTC).
Article became a non-redirect on January 9, 2020 by Aria1561, therefore it classifies as new.
- It has a "readable prose size" with 2696 characters (462 words).
- Unlikely copyright violation with 25.9% of confidence.
- Hook properly formatted, short enough, no neutrality problems.
- The request to appear during the album's release day surpasses the six week maximum, so it needs a consensus at WT:DYK due to 'Special occasion hold requests' sub-section on DYK's reviewing guide that states, "The nomination should be made between at least one week prior to the occasion date, to allow time for reviews and promotions through the prep and queue sets, but not more than six weeks in advance [...] The timeline limitations, including the six week maximum, may be waived by consensus, if a request is made at WT:DYK, but requests are not always successful.." I already opened a thread there to gain a consensus from the community. If the request is unsuccessful, the DYK nomination will be approved. Regards, Paparazzzi (talk) 01:05, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion on whether or not to grant the special occasion request was archived without a proper consensus released, but given that a nominator is new to DYK, even if the guideline was more strictly implemented, I would not be opposed to an IAR exemption in this particular case. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:11, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: Hello! In that case, what should I do next? This is my first time reviewing a hook, and I know I just should approve this and that's it, but I want to make sure the hook would appear on the specified date. Who sets the dates for the hooks? Regards, Paparazzzi (talk) 05:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- Promoters do. With that said, it really will be up to the promoters if they will approve the request or not, and while I would personally approve it, I'm not sure if other editors would given that the talk page discussion ended without any consensus being formed. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:03, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hook approved
. Note for promoter: the nominator wants the hook to appear on the main page on March 13. Paparazzzi (talk) 00:12, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hook approved
- Promoters do. With that said, it really will be up to the promoters if they will approve the request or not, and while I would personally approve it, I'm not sure if other editors would given that the talk page discussion ended without any consensus being formed. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:03, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: Hello! In that case, what should I do next? This is my first time reviewing a hook, and I know I just should approve this and that's it, but I want to make sure the hook would appear on the specified date. Who sets the dates for the hooks? Regards, Paparazzzi (talk) 05:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion on whether or not to grant the special occasion request was archived without a proper consensus released, but given that a nominator is new to DYK, even if the guideline was more strictly implemented, I would not be opposed to an IAR exemption in this particular case. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:11, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
