Template:Did you know nominations/Point set registration
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 10:50, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Point set registration
[edit]
- ... that point set registration can be used to align MRI scans and CAT scans?
Moved to mainspace by Dllu (talk). Self nominated at 18:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC).
Looks like a bit of an essay and a scary amount of math. Words such as "we" are not encyclopedic. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I have rephrased all occurrences of "we", even though Wikipedia:Mos#First-person_pronouns states that "The author's we found in scientific writing" is sometimes acceptable. I believe it is better to include a brief derivation of the common techniques used to solve the point set registration problem, and this invariably requires some math. Can you please elaborate what you mean by "looks like a bit of an essay"? Please let me know of any other deficiencies with the article, since the last peer review received no feedback. Thanks! dllu (t,c) 06:51, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Statements such as "we must", "we do", etc. Passive voice is preferable. One reads like an essay/how to guide, the other more descriptive. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:16, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
-
- Almost. Still missing two. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:50, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Good eye. I removed 2 more occurrences of "we" and 3 occurrences of "our". dllu (t,c) 16:51, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Looks good to go now. AGF on offline refs. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:27, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
