Template:Did you know nominations/Picasso referendum of Basel
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 08:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
1967 Basel Picasso paintings purchase referendum
... that on 17 December 1967 the people of Basel voted to purchase two paintings by Pablo Picasso in the Picasso referendum of Basel?Source: The greatest artist of the 20th century, a grassroots hippie movement, super-rich chemical industrialists, direct democracy: all the ingredients of a fairy-tale story in which, 50 years ago, Basel voters said “yes” to the purchase of two Picassos.
- ALT1:
... that the citizens of Basel approved the purchase of two paintings by Pablo Picasso in the Picasso referendum of Basel of 1967?Source: same
- ALT1:
Created by Paradise Chronicle (talk). Self-nominated at 06:59, 23 April 2021 (UTC).
- Welcome to DYK, Paradise Chronicle! Interesting vote, on good sources, and I read German. Please write the hook in a way that Picasso's name appears only one, best by getting the referendum to the front. In the hook, we don't need the day but the year to put it in perspective. We don't need Picass's given name. - In the article, please check for missing commas (after Switzerland, before and after the image names". "was not to the delight" is no encyclopedic language ;) - Please repeat everything from the lead also in the article, such as the paintings' names, and perhaps write Background in chronological order? - Please avoid short sections, best perhaps by fewer sections? Both "developments" and "Aftermath" are not really telling, at least to me. The gallery is at present completely detached from the rest of the article, and it would help connecting if the titles of the paintings were consistent, French, or English, or both, but then consistently both. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Found hooks adapted:
- ALT0a:
... that in the Picasso referendum of Basel in 1967, the people of Basel voted to purchase two paintings in a majority vote?Source: The greatest artist of the 20th century, a grassroots hippie movement, super-rich chemical industrialists, direct democracy: all the ingredients of a fairy-tale story in which, 50 years ago, Basel voters said “yes” to the purchase of two Picassos. - ALT1a:
... that in the Picasso referendum in Basel of 1967, the citizens of Basel approved the purchase of two of his paintings?Source: same
Thank you for those! (Next time, put new alternatives at the bottom yourself, otherwise the reviewer's response makes little sense. I don't think we need "majority", rather for the city's museum, no? ALT1 is fine as it is.
- Gerda Arendt Thank you, too and I agree on that ALT1 is fine as it is. I have adapted the article a bit in order to bring it in a better shape. I removed the section Gallery, but not the Gallery template, then I changed the titles into English language and reworded or exchanged several phrases. What do you think?Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Looks promising, need sleep. - The article was moved, are you happy with it? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:57, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- As to me, the new title is fine, more detailed and also according to the Wikipedia order with the date at the beginning. But I would prefer to use "Picasso paintings purchase referendum of/in Basel" for the hook if possible.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 04:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Now I woke up again, and check my watchlist. The new title is 1967 Basel Picasso paintings purchase referendum. We can keep the hooks as they are (done), but need to fix the other links, - call the priceless Mandarax. Please don't move the nomination. I'll look at the article later, - rest of long watchlist and several urgents first. Pipe here differently if you like. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Aw, thanks, Gerda. Done. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 07:59, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- ready for 18 May, International Museums Day, per my talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:44, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- I've added another optional hook for the International Museums Day 2021 on the 18 May.Paradise Chronicle (talk)
- ALT2 :
... that the people of Basel voted to purchase the paintings The two brothers and Sitting Arlequin by Pablo Picasso in the Picasso referendum in Basel of 1967 so they could stay in the Kunstmuseum Basel.[1] - I moved your suggestion down here, otherwise it was already approved ;)
- The idea is good. How about turning it around, and I don't think we need the names of the paintings, - Picasso alone looks more important than the unlinked titles. Something like this?
- ALT2a: ... that in order to keep two paintings by Pablo Picasso in the Kunstmuseum Basel, the people of Basel voted in the 1967 Basel Picasso paintings purchase referendum to buy them.
- I normally like the bolded link at the beginning, but this one is long enough to stand out. Striking ALT2 as too long, but feel free to word other shorter suggestion. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:26, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- ALT2 :
- Aw, thanks, Gerda. Done. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 07:59, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Now I woke up again, and check my watchlist. The new title is 1967 Basel Picasso paintings purchase referendum. We can keep the hooks as they are (done), but need to fix the other links, - call the priceless Mandarax. Please don't move the nomination. I'll look at the article later, - rest of long watchlist and several urgents first. Pipe here differently if you like. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- As to me, the new title is fine, more detailed and also according to the Wikipedia order with the date at the beginning. But I would prefer to use "Picasso paintings purchase referendum of/in Basel" for the hook if possible.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 04:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Looks promising, need sleep. - The article was moved, are you happy with it? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:57, 27 April 2021 (UTC)