Template:Did you know nominations/Piano Concerto No. 6 (Mozart)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Piano Concerto No. 6 (Mozart)

(

)

Young Mozart

... that in Mozart's early Piano Concerto in B-flat major (composer pictured), two oboes play in the outer movements, and two flutes instead in the Andante?
- ALT1:... that the Andante of the early Piano Concerto in B-flat major by Mozart (pictured) features similar elements as the famous Andante from his Concerto in C major?

Reviewed: Bulverton
Comment: Source for both [1], - the article would make a nice companion to the TFA on 24 March.

5x expanded by Syek88 (talk) and Gerda Arendt (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 15:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC).

QPQ is completed, sufficient expansion has been made, both hooks are sourced. I think the first hook is preferable. Image is in the public domain. This looks good to go, although it might not be put into the queue in time for the 24th. Lepricavark (talk) 14:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry to come to this late, but I think we should put "No. 6" in the one-sentence spiel. The reason is that we have other much more famous B-flat major concertos (450, 456 and 595), and readers who know this but don't click through the bolded link will wonder which one we're talking about. Syek88 (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

No problem, never too late for improvements ;) - I think "early" may be better instead, for a readership not knowing what K. means. We shouldn't say it all, people should get interested in reading the article. You can word some ALT2, if you like. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes - I agree - I think "early" is the best way to go - far more descriptive than a number. I have changed it above. Syek88 (talk) 21:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC)