Template:Did you know nominations/Phomoxanthone A

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:33, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Phomoxanthone A

(

)

Mitochondrial fragmentation caused by phomoxanthone A

* ... that the mycotoxin phomoxanthone A distorts the mitochondria so that they look like beads on a string (pictured)?

- ALT1:... that the mycotoxin phomoxanthone A fragments the mitochondria within minutes (pictured)?

Comment: For the first hook, I suggest the image Mitochondrial OMM and matrix in DRP1-KO cells after PXA instead of the video.
Reviewed: Astrobrachion constrictum and Antipathes fiordensis

Created by Shinryuu (talk). Self-nominated at 10:01, 23 February 2018 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article was new enough when nominated, is easily long enough (~7800 characters), maintains a neutral tone, and is built on good published sources. QPQ was done. The first hook doesn't seem to be present in the article, but ALT1 is present and supported by a citation, once I replace "in seconds" with "within minutes" (the claim in the article). I'm swapping the image for the video, which in my judgment is not sufficiently clear at such a low resolution. I'm not seeing any plagiarism problems; a few phrases are close to the sources, but it's hard to put such technical ideas "in one's own words" without making them unclear or inaccurate. This article appears to be ready for DYK! Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 19:26, 29 March 2018 (UTC)