Template:Did you know nominations/Philippine cuckoo-dove

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Philippine cuckoo-dove, Ruddy cuckoo-dove

( Back to T:TDYK )

( Article history links:

• Philippine cuckoo-dove
• Ruddy cuckoo-dove

)

• ... that the Philippine cuckoo-dove was formerly listed as subspecies of the ruddy cuckoo-dove and the brown cuckoo-dove? Source: [1]

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Love's Labour's Lost (opera) and Template:Did you know nominations/Turán's brick factory problem
• Comment: Source requires subscription

5x expanded by Adityavagarwal (talk). Self-nominated at 15:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC).

• Starting review--Kevmin § 20:30, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

• Both articles expanded over 5X and recently enough. Articles are both referenced, with the hook cited, and matching the sources. No policy issues identified, and no copyvio problems. looks good to go.--Kevmin § 20:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)