The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 11:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Overall: Passes DYK checklist. No picture used. Both hooks have been verified as sourced. I like original. Earwig's copy violation detector did spotlight possible violations, but I think this is because of commonly used phrases in the literature discussing the Supreme Court reasoning on the issue. I did discuss this with the article's creator. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC)