Template:Did you know nominations/Patag (sword)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:43, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Patag (sword)

(

)

... that patags once used in combat were marked with a cross?
ALT1: ... that patags once used in combat are especially valued?

Created by Catlemur (talk). Self nominated at 08:06, 30 September 2014 (UTC).

Over 3700 bytes and nominated one day after creation, satisfying date and length criteria. QPQ not required, though one is certainly welcome. Reference information is incomplete - please provide authors, publishers, etc. for the sources you use. For multipage sources, please provide the page number on which to find info associated with a citation - readers shouldn't have to scan a 20 page document to find this info (such as those to ref #1). For the statement "Patag is regarded as...", source #2 makes no claim of "royal family" or any similar terms. Some sources refer to these swords as "patang" - could you mention this in the article. Hook is short and cited, but I don't think it's particularly interesting - perhaps mention that these swords are referred to as "dripcha" and prized. Overall, an interesting article with only minor issues to address. Mind matrix 01:14, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

The image is in the public domain and recognizable at the size required for DYK. Mind matrix 01:18, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

All fixed.--Catlemur (talk) 09:08, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Either hook is OK (short, sourced, etc.), but ALT1 is more interesting. Mind matrix 14:08, 3 October 2014 (UTC)