Template:Did you know nominations/Paper Mario

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 14:43, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Paper Mario

(

)

... that Intelligent Systems developed the Paper Mario series only because Square wasn't there to do so? Source: 20 Years Ago, Nintendo Transformed the RPG Genre With Paper Mario
- ALT1:... that the Paper Mario series was changed from role-playing games to action-adventure games because the developers found it to be too similar to Nintendo's other role-playing series, Mario & Luigi? Source: The Paper Mario Game Not Everyone Wants

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Chamber of Commerce Building (Manhattan)

Created by Panini! (talk). Self-nominated at 21:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC).

Comment to be eligible for DYK the content must be original, not copied from other articles. Panini! when writing this article, did you copy any content or wording from other Wikipedia articles? (t · c) buidhe 04:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Buidhe, no, a lot of the content in this article came from my own research (but not WP:OR, to clarify) because this article covers the series as a whole, not necessarily each game in chronological order. This first alt is about the first game, but that article, funily enough, doesn't mention this because this article has yet to be revamped. The second alt isn't mentioned specifically in any article, more of a brief mention. I would like to mention, I did copy and paste sources from other articles in the series because I didn't want to write out the whole template again. P anini ^🥪 14:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

This substantial article replaces a redirect and is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and either hook could be used, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. @Panini!: Can you please deal with the citation and clarification needed tags. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Cwmhiraeth, That was on the top of my to-do-list today. I'll ping you when it is finished. P anini ^🥪 18:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Cwmhiraeth Sorry about two pings, but I already finished. P anini ^🥪 19:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)