Template:Did you know nominations/Papa Cristo's

The following is an archived discussion of Papa Cristo's's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 13:54, 15 April 2013 (UTC).

Papa Cristo's

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the food featured in the movie My Big Fat Greek Wedding was provided by the Greek restaurant Papa Cristo's?

Reviewed: Fourth dimension in art

Created by Proudbolsahye (talk). Self nominated at 21:56, 25 March 2013 (UTC).

At over 2,000 characters, it meets the length criteria, and at least the English-language sources check out. The hook is interesting but I think "seen" is a stronger word than "featured" in this context. I'm pretty sure the movie poster needs to be removed as it does not meet the rules of fair use: "It to provide critical commentary on the film, event, etc. in question or of the poster itself, not solely for illustration" (see Licensing on this page). - Gilliam (talk) 08:52, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

The image most certainly cannot be used in the hook per a longstanding custom to not have fair use items on the main page. I also contend that it cannot be used in the Papa Cristo's article as it contributes nothing apart from decoration and is not extensively discussed in the article as an image. I will be bold and remove it here and there. Chris857 (talk) 16:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

It's fine with me Chris857. Thank you. Proudbolsahye (talk) 17:32, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

The article is fine now. The interesting bit of pop trivia will be an asset to the DYK column.- Gilliam (talk) 21:02, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination still needs to be approved; the "seen" vs. "featured" issue in the hook has not been addressed as yet. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:12, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm being bold and changing seen -> featured in the hook. It looks like the nominator may have approved this on 26 March. I also verified the sourcing of that statement in the article. The article and hook meet DYK's length requirements. Good to go. - tucoxn\^talk 01:46, 15 April 2013 (UTC)