Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Panchakanya (Hinduism)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Panchakanya (Hinduism)'s DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 06:56, 16 February 2013 (UTC).

Panchakanya (Hinduism)

[edit]

Painting of five iconic heroines of Mahabharata and Ramayana epics of Hinduism

Created/expanded by Nvvchar (talk), Redtigerxyz (talk). Nominated by Nvvchar (talk) at 03:53, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

  • ALT... five heroines (pictured) from Hindu epics venerated as exemplary chaste women, are recorded to have "known" at least a man, other than her husband? Redtigerxyz Talk 15:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Nicely written article. QPQ done. 5x expansion applicable. GTG! I prefer second hook because its more catchy. - Vivvt • (Talk) 23:53, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Don't really get ALT1. "to have 'known' at least a man" makes no sense to me. Do you mean "each recorded to have 'known' at least one man who was not their husband" — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Actually, knowing at least one man was before marriage. I would suggest "to have known' at least one man before marriage who was not their husband.".--Nvvchar. 12:28, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
  • My main issue is with " at least a man". That construct sounds really odd to me. I'd expect to see "at least one man" — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:51, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Yes, here is the reworded ALT2 Hook ... that five heroines (pictured) from Hindu epics venerated as exemplary chaste women, are recorded to have "known at least one man", other than her husband?--Nvvchar. 18:20, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
  • ALT2 approved, much better. Tick based on above review. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:01, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but the phrasing still seems odd to me. There are five women, but at the end it says "her husband". Was it just one of them that "knew" another man or did each of them?--Carabinieri (talk) 03:46, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
ALT3 ... that each of the five heroines (pictured) from Hindu epics, venerated as exemplary chaste women, is recorded to have "known" at least one man other than her husband? Redtigerxyz Talk 05:39, 16 February 2013 (UTC)