Template:Did you know nominations/Painting of the Six Kings

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Painting of the Six Kings

(

)

Painting of the Six Kings

... that the eighth-century Umayyad Painting of the Six Kings (pictured) was badly damaged when Alois Musil tried to remove it from its site in Quseir Amra, Jordan?
Source: Fowden, Garth (20 September 2004). Qusayr 'Amra: Art and the Umayyad Elite in Late Antique Syria. University of California Press. p. 198. ISBN 978-0-520-92960-9.
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link], or briefly cite, the source)

Reviewed: 2007 Coca-Cola 600

Created by HaEr48 (talk). Self-nominated at 05:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC).

Comment: Interesting article, but really needs a native speaker to run through the prose. Also it needs to be clearer that the pic is some sort of print reproduction from 1907, no doubt based on a photo, but not one itself. Johnbod (talk) 02:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC) -->

Thanks, Johnbod. I replaced the image with the photo of the actual thing, thanks for pointing out that the previous one's a reproduction! Regarding the prose, I will see what I can do, and I also submitted a request to WP:COPYEDITORS. HaEr48 (talk) 19:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

• Some issues found.

- ✓ This article is new and was created on 04:36, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 4841 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✗ This article has the following issues:
  - {{clarify}} from October 2016
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (14.5% confidence; confirm)
  - Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

• No overall issues detected

- ✓ The media File:Sixkings.jpg is free-use
- ✗ The hook ALT0 is too long at 301 characters
- ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 1 characters
- ✓ HaEr48 has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 0 more DYKs.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:48, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks bot :) To clarify for reviewers. the 300-character count include all the wikilnk characters. Just the plain text and without the (pictured), it is 149 characters only. HaEr48 (talk) 23:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Copyediting is done (thanks Corinne!). Can we look at this nomination again? HaEr48 (talk) 04:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

QPQ was done. Hook is confirmed in he reference. Article is big enough. new enough when nominated, correct person credited. English is copyedited enough to understand, though I did try to make one point clear. It is completely referenced with suitable sources, and is neutral. Copyviotool can't find a problem. The hook is in the article, cited and supported by the reference. Good to go now. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)