Template:Did you know nominations/Pachycondyla petiolosa
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Pachycondyla petiolosa
[edit]
Pachycondyla petiolosa fossil
- ... that the queens of the fossil ant Pachycondyla petiolosa (pictured) are described as being heavy and massive?
- Reviewed: Olive tanager
- Comment: Started review of Olive tanager
Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 03:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC).
- The article is new:
- The article is long enough:
- The hook is interesting:
- The hook is referenced:
- The hook is below 200 characters:
- A google search does not reveal any copyright violation:
- The article follows most other important policies:
- QPQ:
Article is good to go. Cambalachero (talk) 17:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- The article is new:
