Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Lot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Mentoz86 (talk) 13:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Operation Lot

[edit]

The Scorpion Pass

  • Comment: The image provided here is from Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 and won 3rd place in Israel.

Created by Ynhockey (talk). Self nom at 22:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

I have read over the article and things appear to be mostly in order I had a couple of questions about though. Cheers --Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 20:50, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Date of creation checks out.
  • The hook is not referenced at the end of the individual sentence. I'm operating under the assumption that the Hook is part of the the reference at the end of the following sentence - Givati (1994), p. 239 is that correct? There does not seem to be a Google books preview available.
Yes, that is correct. —Ynhockey (Talk) 21:39, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Any chance the [citation needed] can be taken care of before it appears on the main page?
The idea behind it is just to say that the first short sentence isn't taken from the source at the end of the paragraph. All in all it's sort of an obvious statement which is hard to source for that reason. It can be removed if you don't think it's a good idea that citation needed tags appear in DYKs. —Ynhockey (Talk) 21:39, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
I'll leave that up to you. If you think it is best to make sure that first sentence isn't confused as being part of the ref than I have no issues with it being left as is. --Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 21:53, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

- Good to go. Offline sources accepted in good faith.