Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Fourth Wave Feminism

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:42, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Operation Fourth Wave Feminism

(

)

... that the "bikini bridge" and "free bleeding" were hoaxes spread by 4chan?

ALT1:... ~~that a blogger who was criticized for sharing her "Top Five Reasons I'm Glad Paul Walker is Dead" would fall for a "free bleeding" hoax spread by 4chan users?~~
Reviewed: Luftrausers

Created by ViperSnake151 (talk). Self nominated at 05:21, 13 February 2014 (UTC).

It has been suggested by Victuallers that this nomination be merged with template:did you know nominations/Thigh gap.--Laun chba ller 12:33, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Date and length fine. I used the blue tick because the sources supporting it are there, just not next to it. I think that the original hook is probably better because it could be a BLP violation if the alt is run. QPQ done. GTG. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 21:39, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

The sources supporting the hook must be inline by the end of the sentence where the fact(s) can be found, or a tick is not appropriate. The AGF tick should only be used when the source is cited but not available online and the reviewer has to Assume Good Faith, having not been able to check it. (This can extend to non-hook sources as well.) However, since this nomination is apparently being combined with the Thigh gap nomination—that's what ViperSnake151 has posted there—the hook sourcing will depend on that hook and be considered in that context. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:02, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
This hook is now a DYKtick as I have corrected BlueMoonset's point. However ViperSnake151 has generously agreed that this hook can be combined with Thigh gap to make a 1 April Hook Victuallers (talk) 19:18, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Unfortunately, Thigh gap was not approved in time for April Fools and the nomination is being closed as unsuccessful, so this nomination is being reactivated. It needs to use its original solo hook (ALT1 has been struck for good reason). I think this needs a new review: the original review did not address neutrality and close paraphrasing and similar DYK issues, and as best as I can determine was confused about the sourcing and proper use of approval ticks. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Why don't we use the proposed hook at WP:DYK/Thigh gap, but unbold thigh gap, if that makes sense? Or something like:

ALT2: ... that the bikini bridge hoax was dubbed the new thigh gap?--Laun chba ller 19:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

The ALT2 hook is in article, cited and confirmed. Also it's a suitable length. Too bad there is no free picture available otherwise this would get a lot of click throughs. copyvio check found nothing. so Good to go alt2. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:49, 18 April 2014 (UTC)