Template:Did you know nominations/One Kemble Street

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

One Kemble Street

(

)

Space House, One Kemble Street

... that One Kemble Street (pictured) was built using precast cruciform concrete blocks to avoid the use of a scaffold?
Alt1 ... that One Kemble Street (pictured) was built for the same developer as London's Centre Point?
Alt2 ... that Space House (tower pictured) was built during the 1960s speculative property boom in London?

Reviewed: Rumbler (siren)

Created by Philafrenzy (talk). Self-nominated at 21:58, 14 January 2017 (UTC).

New enough, long enough. I feel that Alt2 is more interesting to a broad audience and good to go. I have added an online ref to the lead. SethWhales^talk 14:15, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

@Philafrenzy: As far as I can see, no QPQ has been done. Also pinging @Seth Whales: to confirm whether the original hook is also approved, because I think the modular construction of this tower is very interesting. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Cwmhiraeth, I just felt that Alt2 would be more interesting (and understandable) to a broad audience rather than the method of construction, which would only be of interest to a narrower group. Although I have no problems in changing it. Just noticed that the QPQ has not yet been completed.SethWhales ^talk 17:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

QPQ done. I have to agree that the first hook is the most interesting in my view. I have included a close up of a block in the article. The word cruciform is in itself quite interesting. Alt2 is a bit banal. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:48, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

- Length, Date, QPQ, Cite, and Earwigs all checkout for the original hook, image taken by article author and appears to be freely licensed. Original hook approved. Mifter Public (talk) 20:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)