Template:Did you know nominations/Olivos and Tezonco stations
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Olivos metro station, Tezonco metro station
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that the Superior Audit Office of the Federation of Mexico made observations in 2017 of damages to the Tezonco–Olivos section (pictured) previous to its collapse in May 2021? Source: "Justo en el tramo de las estaciones Olivos-Tezonco, la Auditoría Superior de la Federación, realizó algunas observaciones de daños luego del sismo ocurrido en septiembre del año 2017, mismos que no se resolvieron." ["Right in the Olivos-Tezonco stations section, the Superior Audit Office of the Federation, made some observations of damages after the earthquake occurred in September 2017, which were not resolved.]" (Canal 44)
5x expanded by Tbhotch (talk). Self-nominated at 16:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC); new article by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 19:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Tbhotch: Both pages have received new enough and large enough expansions, and a double-QPQ is present. The source in both articles (identical text) checks out and supports the claims in the article. I did have to improve both pages to make the writing more idiomatic, and the hook needs the same treatment. I'm particularly wondering if "Superior Auditor of the Federation" (which I had personally used in my work before) may be a better translation for the ASF, though I note that English-language published material is absolutely all over the place, for instance this OECD report uses three different translations (and I'm contemplating writing the missing article). This is basically ALT0 repackaged: Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:39, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- ALT0a: ... that the Superior Auditor of the Federation of Mexico observed damage to an overpass between Tezonco and Olivos stations on the Mexico City Metro prior to its collapse in May 2021?
- Update: I've now created Superior Auditor of the Federation, which I propose to add to this hook. QPQ: Whitby Mall Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: Thanks for the review and for creating the ASF article. I'm not opposed and that would be ALT1: ... that the Superior Auditor of the Federation of Mexico observed damage to an overpass between Tezonco and Olivos stations (pictured) on the Mexico City Metro prior to its collapse in May 2021?
- Alternatively if posted this month:
ALT2: ... that the Superior Auditor of the Federation of Mexico observed damage to an overpass between Tezonco and Olivos stations (pictured) on the Mexico City Metro prior to its collapse earlier this month?That would require another reviewer. (CC) Tbhotch™ 16:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- I have no objection to the wording on either of those, pending another reviewer since I've now contributed an article to the hook. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- New reviewer still needed to review the new Superior Auditor of the Federation article that has been added to this nomination, and the ALT1 hook that includes it. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:05, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello! Taking on good faith the review that Sammi performed for the originally-nominated content, I will review the Superior Auditor article and ALT1. To wit: when it was added to this nomination, the article was newly-created. Length is well over the minimum, no issues with copyvio, POV, or reliable sources. I am taking the referencing on good faith as I don't speak Spanish, but on a spot check nothing screams of unreliability. The hook is interesting - the reader of course wonders why nothing was done about the damage. The picture is free-use and looks nice at a small size. We're good to go here. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:48, 17 June 2021 (UTC)