Template:Did you know nominations/Olivia Wingate

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 17:50, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Olivia Wingate

(

)

Olivia Wingate

... that North Carolina Courage soccer player Olivia Wingate (pictured) also played ice hockey in high school? Source: ref5
- ALT1: ... that the hometown newspaper of soccer player Olivia Wingate (pictured) named her "Female Athlete of the Decade" for the 2010s? Source: ref6
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/LK (Carolina Carol Bela)

Created by Hameltion (talk). Self-nominated at 18:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Olivia Wingate; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting: - The original hook is not interesting; many professional athletes play multiple sports in their youth. However, I would say ALT1 is interesting. Even though it's a small newspaper, being named athlete of the decade is still a feat.

Image eligibility:

Freely licensed:
Used in article:
Clear at 100px: - The picture is clear, but it's a little grainy.

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Overall, I'd say the article and nomination looks good. I would recommend ALT1 over ALT0. I'd also like for someone else to double-check the QPQ status as I haven't done many reviews. I'm also not sure how to check whether the image is freely licensed. Significa liberdade (talk) 00:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing, Significa liberdade. FYI, that QPQ check tool just shows that I've had more than five DYK credits; the WP:QPQ is the review itself. And the license of the photo I took (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International yadda yadda) is visible on the file page (yes, not the highest quality – plan to visit another match in a couple weeks). Hameltion (talk | contribs) 04:36, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, Hameltion! As I said, I'm still new to doing DYK reviews, so I'm figuring out the process. I'll keep this in mind as I do more reviews! Significa liberdade (talk) 15:48, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

No worries, Significa liberdade. If you're satisfied to add {{subst:DYKtick}} (anywhere after the {{DYK?no}}), this nomination will automatically move to the Approved page. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 21:50, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Significa liberdade (talk • contribs) 23:09, 14 August 2023 (UTC) (placed above by reviewer, hope copying below is okay... Hameltion (talk | contribs) 05:24, 15 August 2023 (UTC))