Template:Did you know nominations/Numayrid dynasty

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:12, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Numayrid dynasty

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that most Numayrid princes, apprehensive of urban life, ruled their cities from their Bedouin camps in the pastures?

• ALT1:... that the Numayrid ruler Mani' ibn Shabib transformed the Sabian temple of Harran into a fortified palace?
• Reviewed: Zach Loveday

Moved to mainspace by Al Ameer son (talk). Self-nominated at 20:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC).

 • No issues found with article, ready for human review.

• • ✓ This article is new and was created on 19:56, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 22007 characters
  • ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
  • ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
  • ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (7.4% confidence; confirm)
    • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

 • Some overall issues detected

• • ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 112 characters
  • ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 101 characters
  • ✗ Al Ameer son has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 02:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

• @Al Ameer son: QPQ review? EdChem (talk) 04:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

@EdChem: QPQ done. --Al Ameer (talk) 22:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

• Full review needed by human reviewer now that QPQ has been submitted. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

• New enough, long enough, well referenced, neutrally written, no close paraphrasing seen in online sources. The first hook is much hookier for a broad readership than the second; hook refs verified and cited inline. QPQ done. First hook good to go. Yoninah (talk) 20:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)