Template:Did you know nominations/Notiomys
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 20:59, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Notiomys
[edit]- ... that owls were more efficient at catching Edwards' long-clawed mouse than were researchers?
- ALT1:... that before the 1990s, owls were more efficient at catching Edwards' long-clawed mouse than were researchers?
- Reviewed: PSLV-C2
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 09:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC).
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article has been expanded from 316 chars to 2387 chars since 14:52, 21 January 2014 (UTC), a 7.55-fold expansion
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 2387 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely (8.3% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 87 characters
- ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 105 characters
- ✓ Cwmhiraeth has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/PSLV-C2 was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
New enough and expanded over 5x, QPQ done, all ¶ with citations, a copyvio check reveals no problems. Can't access all of the Google Books preview source used in the article, so AGF that hook and alt content is stated in the source. North America1000 23:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
