Template:Did you know nominations/Nerotalanlagen
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Nerotalanlagen
Old trees and stone bridge in Nerotal
- ... that Nerotalanlagen (pictured) is a park along a creek in Wiesbaden, built in the late 19th century to enhance the town's spa quality? Source: several
Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 08:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC).
Hi sista @Gerda Arendt:! New enough, but unfortunately not long enough. Could you expand it just a little bit more? The resting place about the two notable German gentlemen is uncited in the article. If you are going for a picture hook, I think it is better to be other than this one haha. I wonder if the fact about why part of the park was intentionally left bare (without trees planted) intriguingly interesting. Would you like to propose alternates? I also fail to find any mention of improving spa quality in the article itself. Much love <3 VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 15:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for looking but couldn't you wait just a bit longer? I just explained how today went ... - work on three unplanned articles. It's long enough by char count, but yes, I plan to expand and cite and write qpq, and perhaps take a pic myself. Now I have to nominate the next unfinished one ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:58, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- I reviewed now Template:Did you know nominations/Theresa Plummer-Andrews. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- As this has a full review needed tag, I will review this
Article is just long enough (1554 characters), new enough (created and nominated on 12 September). One sentence is not currently sourced, I have added a citation needed tag (as I couldn't find it in the online sources, though I may have missed it as my German is limited)
ALT0 is short enough, interesting, and well cited. As mentioned above, a hook about it being deliberately left bare would also work, if you want- QPQ done
Gerda Arendt Once the one citation needed tag is resolved, this will be good to go. Please ping me once it's resolved. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- I seriously do not understand why it needs another review when NOTHING has been communicated here, and somebody just came in and slaps in a red icon. @Yoninah: thoughts? VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 17:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Have you read the text? It says, "Article issues have been resolved and is ready for a new review." BTW, I added a reference and removed the tag. The article should be ready to go. --evrik (talk) 17:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- It’s not on my screen for real. VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 17:37, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- I understand none of this, but just returned from a funeral day and this is not as urgent as some other pending tasks. Sorry. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Vincent60030: I think evrik is referring to his comment made on 15:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC). He gave the nom a {{DYK?again}} tick, which according to the DYK instructions edit notice, means "Article issues have been resolved and is ready for a new review." Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: Thank you for pointing out, but just writing a red icon (which presumably is defining whatever that is needed to say is not enough to explain anything. If Evrik has personally addressed the issue he should have mentioned it clearly. Hence why I said I do not see any mention of this. I also am not very fond of a butt in for a re-review that I am willing to wait to be given away to some other reviewer from a red icon. (And no, I do not mean you) Also sorry for all the trouble Joseph2302 you have done a good job on this, and thank you. May I ask though, that erm who will be the reviewer on this? I do not want to stress out everyone here but this has turned really messy from just a butt in. VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 08:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Vincent60030: I think evrik is referring to his comment made on 15:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC). He gave the nom a {{DYK?again}} tick, which according to the DYK instructions edit notice, means "Article issues have been resolved and is ready for a new review." Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Vincent60030: Are you new to this? Your reaction to me asking for a new review seems out of proportion to the action. @Narutolovehinata5: I fixed the issues and I think this is ready to go. --evrik (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'll withdraw myself out of this then since I did not receive basic courtesy, and instead all I got was someone being busybody and not even communicating on my talk page. At least I had the decency to ask who is continuing this review to clarify problems and engage better communication. Thanks, peace out. VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 14:42, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
