The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 04:10, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Overall: Approve both hooks but if the quirky hook is used we'll have to add sometimes as it could have been just one occasion that talking elephants were OK'd. BorgQueen (talk) 19:43, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
I suppose an alternative could be "can be okay"? TompaDompa (talk) 19:47, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Yup, that works too. BorgQueen (talk) 19:54, 5 May 2023 (UTC)