Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Neerja

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Neerja

[edit]

Improved to Good Article status by Mr. Smart LION (talk). Self-nominated at 05:57, 25 June 2016 (UTC).

  • Some issues found.
    • This article was Listed as a Good Article on 05:36, 25 June 2016
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 14936 characters
    • Paragraphs [18] (On ... .) in this article lack a citation.
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • There is possible close paraphrasing on this article with 32.4% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 144 characters
  • This is Mr. Smart LION's' 3rd nomination. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 2 more DYKs.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 16:43, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

I've removed the copyvio information from the article. Mr. Smart ℒION☎️⋡ 17:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pan Am Flight 73 should be mentioned somewhere in the first hook, and part of the hook is not cited in the article (359 out of 379 people saved, etc). ALT1 is cited in the article. Paragraph 1 of the "Box office" section needs a citation. The article is well-written and neutral, and no copyvio was detected. QPQ has been done, even though it was not required. Random86 (talk) 02:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Issues have been fixed, and both hooks are now good to go. Random86 (talk) 23:05, 8 July 2016 (UTC)