Template:Did you know nominations/National Science Foundation: Under the Microscope
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:41, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
National Science Foundation: Under the Microscope
[edit]- ... that the National Science Foundation: Under the Microscope report by US Senator Tom Coburn has generated controversy for portrayed much scientific research as "silly"?
- Reviewed: Yossele the Holy Miser
- Comment: alt: ... that the National Science Foundation: Under the Microscope report by US Senator Tom Coburn threatens to cut all federal funding for social science research?
Created/expanded by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 23:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
| Format | Citation | Neutrality | Interest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crisco 1492 (talk) | Crisco 1492 (talk) | Crisco 1492 (talk) | Crisco 1492 (talk) |
| Format | Citation | Neutrality | Interest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crisco 1492 (talk) | Crisco 1492 (talk) | Crisco 1492 (talk) |
| Length | Newness | Adequate citations |
Formatted citations |
Reliable sources |
Neutrality | Plagiarism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crisco 1492 (talk) | Crisco 1492 (talk) | Crisco 1492 (talk) | Crisco 1492 (talk) | Crisco 1492 (talk) | Crisco 1492 (talk) | Looks okay Crisco 1492 (talk) |
Original hook good to go! Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:27, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
