Template:Did you know nominations/Nathalie Lieven
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 10:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Nathalie Lieven
- ... that Mrs Justice Lieven gave permission for a dying child's life support to be withdrawn, having found that he was "brainstem dead" and therefore had no best interests to consider?
Source: Clare Dyer, Baby at centre of legal battle can have life support removed, says judge, The BMJ, 29 January 2020- ALT1:... that Mrs Justice Lieven made an Order for a pregnant woman with learning difficulties to have an abortion against her wishes, but that this was overturned in the Court of Appeal?
Source: Harriet Sherwood, Appeal court overturns forced abortion ruling, The Guardian, 24 June 2019
- ALT1:... that Mrs Justice Lieven made an Order for a pregnant woman with learning difficulties to have an abortion against her wishes, but that this was overturned in the Court of Appeal?
- Reviewed: Zheltuga Republic
Created by Moonraker (talk). Self-nominated at 04:41, 14 April 2021 (UTC).
new and big enough biog of notable subject. Hooks are interesting. I find the first more informative of a point of law. Difficult subjects dealt with neutrally with sound sources. Sadly no image. I removed the word "forced" from Alt1 as it implies more than the actual "against her wishes" and both are not required in the hook. So both alts are good to go but I prefer Alt0. Nice work Moonraker. Victuallers (talk) 14:56, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
