Template:Did you know nominations/Nanocetorhinus
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:00, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Nanocetorhinus
[edit]- ... that although the prehistoric shark Nanocetorhinus is named for the resemblance of its teeth to miniature Cetorhinus teeth, there is no evidence the two genera are closely related?
Created/expanded by Wilhelmina Will (talk). Self nom at 07:22, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewed: Traffic collision in India
- Hook: Short enough, cited, interesting
- Article: New enough, long enough, cited, no close paraphrasing, single source accepted due to inherent notability.
- Summary: Good to go! Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:22, 4 May 2012 (UTC)