Template:Did you know nominations/Nakodaji
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Nakodaji
- ... that the deity in Nakodaji is considered as a business partner by businessmen? Source: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=C8HcBvE8XJ4C&pg=PA80#v=onepage&q&f=false
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Thihapate of Mohnyin
- Comment: I have requested help with copyedit from Guild of Copy Editors. Thanks and regards Pratyk321 (talk) 06:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Created by Pratyk321 (talk). Self-nominated at 06:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - Although Earwig seems to think this is fine it looks to be an issue. For instance the phrase "Many businessmen also consider the deity as a business partner and pledge a percentage of profit as an offering." is almost word for word lifted from the source.
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: I really like the hook and article so it was a shame to come across the copyvio issues. Vladimir.copic (talk) 07:20, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Vladimir.copic: Thanks a lot for reviewing the article. Apologies, I relied too much on Earwig for copyvio check. I have copyedited the article to address the issues. Kindly, review the same and please reach out if issue persists. Thanks and regards Pratyk321 (talk) 08:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Copyvio issues look to be fixed. All good to go. Vladimir.copic (talk) 05:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)