Template:Did you know nominations/Nailsea Glassworks
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 16:03, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Nailsea Glassworks
[edit]... that Nailsea Glassworks is covered in sand?
Created by Rodw (talk). Nominated by Pigsonthewing (talk) at 11:19, 1 January 2015 (UTC).
Pigsonthewing, Rodw; QPQ needed. Copyvio checked. Very interested hook. But the ref cited does not have the cited fact about sand. Verification failed. Redtigerxyz Talk 19:13, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't nominate this article (although I was intending to later). If I do a review the QPQ detector may not show it up as the nominator - would this be appropriate? I can't find a RS reference specifically saying "sand" - this was taken from the existing Nailsea article (and has been picked up by Flikr & other non RS sites). I have added several references to the article, one of which says "sand-like substance". — Rod talk 21:29, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- No QPQ needed, as I'm the nominator, but Rodw is the author. Perhaps an alternative hook would be better? Maybe Alt:
... that Nailsea Glassworks' third cone was called Lily?Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Andy Mabbett, As per the updated rules of WP:QPQ, if the nominator has more than 5 credits, he needs to review. --Redtigerxyz Talk 05:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- News to me. Nomination withdrawn; that will be my last third-party nomination. Well done everyone.Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Andy Mabbett, I agree with you. The rules discourage third-party nominations. But I cannot pass this article, considering the new rules. Redtigerxyz Talk 13:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- News to me. Nomination withdrawn; that will be my last third-party nomination. Well done everyone.Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Andy Mabbett, As per the updated rules of WP:QPQ, if the nominator has more than 5 credits, he needs to review. --Redtigerxyz Talk 05:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
In the light of the comment above I have asked for advice at Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Nomination ? procedure for new nomination on whether this should be closed/archived and a new one started or I should just do a QPQ and put it here.— Rod talk 12:46, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Rod, Anyway you will need a QPQ for your self-nomination too. We can continue here. --Redtigerxyz Talk 13:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- I have reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Padbury Hoard although the article is now Lenborough Hoard I don't think adding in the reviewed parameter into the template at this stage would be appropriate.— Rod talk 15:42, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Rod, I still can't find "sand"; can you come up with ALT hooks. Redtigerxyz Talk 16:15, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- 3353-602 (2751 B) size. Removing reused sentences. Redtigerxyz Talk 16:22, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- I have reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Padbury Hoard although the article is now Lenborough Hoard I don't think adding in the reviewed parameter into the template at this stage would be appropriate.— Rod talk 15:42, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- ALT1 - ... that experimental work on the production of cylinder glass was carried out at Nailsea Glassworks?
ALT2 - ... that "Nailsea glass" was a byproduct of the Nailsea Glassworks?- Either of those any good?— Rod talk 16:25, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
ALT2 not in article. ALT1 checks out. Copyvio and rest checked as above.Redtigerxyz Talk 16:45, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
