Template:Did you know nominations/Myth of the clean Wehrmacht
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Myth of the clean Wehrmacht
- ... the myth of the clean Wehrmacht persisted in Germany until the 1990s when it was eroded by the Wehrmacht Exhibition (protesters pictured)? Source: Wette, Wolfram (2007). The Wehrmacht: History, Myth, Reality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674025776. p. 269
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- Reviewed: This is a first-time nomination.
Improved to Good Article status by Jack90s15 (talk), Kudpung (talk) and K.e.coffman (talk). Nominated by Jack90s15 (talk) at 03:05, 21 August 2019 (UTC).
- Comment: Wow. Tough choice between this hook (that it somehow went on that long... almost to the selfpitying movement about Dresden &c.) and how complicit the UK and US were, to facilitate having a West German force as a buffer against the USSR. Great article, although the last sentence of the lede (maybe more?) needs its grammar to be cleaned up a bit. — LlywelynII 19:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- I copyedited the tail end of the lead. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:13, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- The article has been fully copy-edited by WP:GOCE. --K.e.coffman (talk) 15:46, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- The article was promoted to GA status in time. I assume good faith on the references that I can't access. A QPQ is not needed and the image is fine. I don't see the use of shattered in the article, but I do see it in a non-cited image caption so that would need to be fixed. SL93 (talk) 17:47, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- @K.e.coffman:Jack90s15 (talk) 17:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- @SL93: what image ?Jack90s15 (talk) 17:59, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- The first image. It states, "Neo-Nazis protest the Wehrmacht Exhibition that shattered the myth for the German public in the 1990s." SL93 (talk) 18:03, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- @SL93: what image ?Jack90s15 (talk) 17:59, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- @K.e.coffman:Jack90s15 (talk) 17:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- The article was promoted to GA status in time. I assume good faith on the references that I can't access. A QPQ is not needed and the image is fine. I don't see the use of shattered in the article, but I do see it in a non-cited image caption so that would need to be fixed. SL93 (talk) 17:47, 9 September 2019 (UTC)