Template:Did you know nominations/Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 16:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that many people with long COVID develop myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome? Source: https://www.iqwig.de/download/n21-01_me-cfs-aktueller-kenntnisstand_abschlussbericht_v1-0.pdf, p.228
  • ALT1: ... that per healthy life year lost, research funding for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome is only 3-7% of what the average condition gets? Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8290307/
  • ALT2: ... that some people with severe myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome can lose the ability to speak? Source: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng206/resources/myalgic-encephalomyelitis-or-encephalopathychronic-fatigue-syndrome-diagnosis-and-management-pdf-66143718094021 (page 50)
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Chelymorpha alternans

Improved to Good Article status by Femke (talk), Ward20 (talk), and The Quirky Kitty (talk). Nominated by Femke (talk) at 08:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• I will review this. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 20:40, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Overall a good read. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 19:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Either hook is good. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 19:18, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

We are in WP:QPQ backlog mode. Double reviews are required.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

TonyTheTiger, according to https://qpqtool.toolforge.org/qpq/Femke, Femke has made nine DYK nominations, so she does not need an extra QPQ. TSventon (talk) 14:11, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Double QPQ is not required. This nomination is good to go. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 18:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Yes, the QPQ check tool to the right counts only 9. I don't really trust the QPQ tool that much because it barely counts 40% of my own nominations. But If the nominator feels that they have done less than 20 noms this can go forward or they can do the double. This case is on the honor system.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:48, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

I don't see an obvious one missing on the list, but will help with the backlog when I've got some time to spare. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

The tool gives a complete list of the nominations made by Femke since she started editing in 2014. It does not pick up nominations made before 2011, but that is not relevant here. TSventon (talk) 20:11, 17 March 2024 (UTC)