Template:Did you know nominations/Mr. McMahon (miniseries)
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Nineteen Ninety-Four guy talk 10:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Mr. McMahon (miniseries)
- ... that Vince McMahon attempted to buy the rights to the Mr. McMahon documentary, but Netflix refused?
- Source: Bleacher Report
- ALT1: ... that WWE Hall of Famer Rob Van Dam refused to be interviewed for the Mr. McMahon documentary? Source: The Times Of India
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Chocolate in savory cooking
5x expanded by Royiswariii (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
Royiswariii (talk) 16:49, 25 September 2024 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New enough: - no
- Long enough:
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Article is not new enough or expanded within past 5 days according to DYK check. IntentionallyDense (talk) 17:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Note that the article was 952 prose characters long at the end of its first day, 4 September, and it is currently 1911 prose characters, so a 2x expansion over 21 days as opposed to 5x over 7 days (not 5 days). The episodes table does not count at DYK; only prose that isn't part of a list or table counts. The prose count as of 18 September, seven days prior to the nomination, was 1166 prose characters, so the expansion would need to be to 5830 prose characters. This doesn't seem feasible. The best route to a future DYK would be should the article become a Good Article, at which point it could be renominated. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)