Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Mozart Distillerie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Mozart Distillerie

[edit]
  • ... that Mozart Distillerie claim to use "soundmilling" – playing the music of Mozart 380 times into their chocolate liqueurs?
Alt1 ... that Mozart Distillerie play Mozart's String Quartet No. 2 in D major 380 times into each batch of their chocolate liqueurs? Philafrenzy (talk) 21:24, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Created by Philafrenzy (talk), Edwardx (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 13:07, 21 May 2014 (UTC).

  • Length - Good.
  • Date - Good.
  • Hook - Checks out, although I am not fussy on a YouTube self published source, I don't think it is a deal breaker.
  • Policy - Looks good for paraphrasing based on my duplication detector reviews, cites sources, and is neutral. My one issue Philafrenzy and Edwardx, are there any additional third party reliable sources? Ones that aren't drink related? The Bloomberg profile is not bad, but not a whole lot. I think it could pass as is, but the sourcing (quality not number) is a little on the week side for me.
  • Also I like Alt1 for a hook, just my opinion.--kelapstick(bainuu) 21:35, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Expanded the referencing using legal and financial sources. OK now? Philafrenzy (talk) 22:31, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Given the significant coverage in the drink-specific jounrals, the Austrian Times (although I would like to find out if that is a reliable source, but it should be OK in this case), and the Bloomberg short profile, I think it would pass AfD, which was really my primary concern. But with that combination, I think it is good to go. --kelapstick(bainuu) 22:55, 2 June 2014 (UTC)