The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
... that the University of Washington's More Hall Annex once housed a nuclear reactor used for research? Source: "The More Hall Annex, formerly the Nuclear Reactor Building, was a building on the campus of the University of Washington (UW) in Seattle, Washington that once housed a functional nuclear research reactor." (The Seattle Times)
ALT1: ... that the Nuclear Reactor Building on the University of Washington campus in Seattle was listed as a historic landmark after a campaign led by an architecture student? Source: "The structure was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 2009, based on an application from UW architecture student Abby Inpanbutr (then Abby Martin) submitted in spring 2008." (Crosscut)
ALT2: ... that the Nuclear Reactor Building on the University of Washington campus in Seattle was designed with large glass windows to "proudly showcase" the reactor? Source: "The large glass windows enabled public viewing of the reactor room's interior, "proudly showcasing" the goings-on inside." (The Seattle Times)
Overall: Long enough at 10k+ characters. New enough: moved to mainspace Nov 30, nominated same day. All hooks are OK; on the talkpage I raised the factoid that became ALT2, which is my preference. Image was not included with DYK nom but the image in the infobox is excellent and is sourced to a Commons admin, Joe Mabel. QPQ on Lucas Ocampos checked. Neutrally written and extremely well sourced with no para outside of the lede uncited; in fact 50+ citations cover nearly every single sentence. No copyvio detected by Earwig's tool. Overall review is good to go Brianhe (talk) 18:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Long enough at 10k+ characters. New enough: moved to mainspace Nov 30, nominated same day. All hooks are OK; on the talkpage I raised the factoid that became ALT2, which is my preference. Image was not included with DYK nom but the image in the infobox is excellent and is sourced to a Commons admin, Joe Mabel. QPQ on Lucas Ocampos checked. Neutrally written and extremely well sourced with no para outside of the lede uncited; in fact 50+ citations cover nearly every single sentence. No copyvio detected by Earwig's tool. Overall review is good to go Brianhe (talk) 18:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)