The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Overall: In the ALT1 hook, the book actually says, "the most robust instance of progress in inclusivity". I think it is fair to summarize this as moral progress, but you can't quote it as such. You'd have to write something along the lines of "'the most robust instance of progress' in a moral sense", or "... morally speaking", or simply add the word moral in brackets: "instance of [moral] progress"—as you did in the wiki article. Farang Rak Tham(Talk) 08:16, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
I am approving the main hook. I will approve the alt1 hook after you have made some adjustments.--Farang Rak Tham(Talk) 08:16, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Good! @Piotrus: Minor suggestion: can we write the spread of human rights instead? Seems to be a more common usage of articles in English.--Farang Rak Tham(Talk) 08:01, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
In the ALT1 hook, the book actually says, "the most robust instance of progress in inclusivity". I think it is fair to summarize this as moral progress, but you can't quote it as such. You'd have to write something along the lines of "'the most robust instance of progress' in a moral sense", or "... morally speaking", or simply add the word moral in brackets: "instance of [moral] progress"—as you did in the wiki article. Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 08:16, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
I am approving the main hook. I will approve the alt1 hook after you have made some adjustments.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 08:16, 25 April 2019 (UTC)