Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Mongolian shamanism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 02:09, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Mongolian shamanism, Yellow shamanism, Black shamanism, Sagaan Ubgen, Ongon, Dayan Deerh

[edit]

Sabaan Ubgen, the "White Old Man"

Created/expanded by Drmies (talk), LadyofShalott (talk), Uncle G (talk). Nominated by Drmies (talk) at 01:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Articles: All new enough, all long enough. Referenced throughout, no close paraphrasing. I have issues with the number of broken harv refs though (each article has at least one broken harv ref or unused reference)
Summary: Please fix the references a bit. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:59, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
  • I'll get on it, Crisco. Harv is new to me; I am only doing it because Uncle G made me. Thanks, and with my apologies for the sloppy work. Drmies (talk) 14:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Found one missing "ref=harv" in Mongolian shamanism, but how did you see that? Drmies (talk) 14:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Fixed everything I could find, but I did not find something in every article. Please tell me what I missed (and how I can know, next time, that I missed something). Note: Uncle G uses the sfn template in Sagaan Ubgen, and I don't even know what that is or how it works. Yeah, I'm a dummy. Drmies (talk) 14:32, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
    • Ucuha has a really useful script (see my common page).
    • Мелетинский is not used in any article but Sagaan Ubgen. I suggest using the Anglicised spelling as the current one is breaking the template. Otherwise looks fine (no worries about the articles aside from Sagaan Ubgen, unused references never hurt anyone) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
      • I'm going to point Uncle G this way since he added this (somewhere, after which I may have copied it once or twice or more). Drmies (talk) 17:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
      • Never attribute to Cyrillic that which can be satisfactorily explained by the use of the year 1982 instead of the year 1998, copied and pasted multiple times. ☺ Cyrillic works just fine with shortened footnotes, and doesn't break anything. Uncle G (talk) 18:05, 20 August 2012 (UTC)