Template:Did you know nominations/Mnemic neglect
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Lack of response from nominator.
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mnemic neglect
[edit]- ... that feedback from others is less easily recalled when it is negative in nature than when it is positive?
5x expanded by Tkcrown (talk). Self nominated at 19:48, 24 April 2013 (UTC).
Interesting article, well-written and with a lot of high-quality sources. Date and length are fine. However, the intro needs to be a bit longer (see WP:LEDE) and there are major gaps in the citations; in particular, citations are almost entirely missing in the sections titled "Limits of the mnemic neglect model: selective nature of self-protection", "Mnemic neglect and dysphoria" and "Mnemic neglect and anxiety". Please make sure that you add citations to these sections so that this article can be accepted. Prioryman (talk) 18:27, 11 May 2013 (UTC)- I would only add that the meaning of "feedback" in this brief context may be confusing to some members of Wikipedia's international audience. The hook is brief, so a more exact locution could be used instead. Maybe "feedback from other people" would be enough to clarify things. — ℜob C. alias ÀLAROB 00:20, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Nominated a month ago, and the nominator has not edited since that time nor responded to the issues above nor their talk page notification. Prioryman (talk) 07:15, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
