Template:Did you know nominations/Mite
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mite
[edit]- ... that relative to its size, one species of mite is the fastest animal on Earth? Source: "Mite sets new record as world's fastest land animal"
- Reviewed: Code Blue (bull)
Improved to Good Article status by Chiswick Chap (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). Nominated by Cwmhiraeth (talk) at 07:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC).
- @Cwmhiraeth: New(ly promoted to good article) enough, long enough, neutral enough. Doesn't seem to be any copyright violation. Hook is interesting, sourced (although I think it might be ideal if there was a ref to something other than a press release, namely the actual paper: doi:10.1242/jeb.128652 ), clearly stated in article. (Although I wonder if it might be clearer to say something like "a species of mite"? "A mite" gives the impression that this applies to any ol' mite, I think. But this might just be me reading too much into it). QPQ has been done. Passed.
Umimmak (talk) 08:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Umimmak: Thank you for the review. I have added a reference to the paper and have adjusted the hook. Perhaps you could repeat your tick for clarity. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Yes I approve even more so now, thank you. Umimmak (talk) 18:50, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth:
- @Umimmak: Thank you for the review. I have added a reference to the paper and have adjusted the hook. Perhaps you could repeat your tick for clarity. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: New(ly promoted to good article) enough, long enough, neutral enough. Doesn't seem to be any copyright violation. Hook is interesting, sourced (although I think it might be ideal if there was a ref to something other than a press release, namely the actual paper: doi:10.1242/jeb.128652 ), clearly stated in article. (Although I wonder if it might be clearer to say something like "a species of mite"? "A mite" gives the impression that this applies to any ol' mite, I think. But this might just be me reading too much into it). QPQ has been done. Passed.
