Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Miriam Battista

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:44, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Miriam Battista

[edit]

Miriam Battista in 1920

  • ... that child star Miriam Battista (pictured) was often called to cry on camera?

Created by Ailemadrah (talk), Binksternet (talk). Nominated by Binksternet (talk) at 19:09, 3 July 2013 (UTC).

  • Length, date verified. Hook's ref requires paid subscription so accepted AGF. Well referenced article. No copyvio detected though more than one ref requires pay per view so couldn't check them all. QPQ done. Hook is interesting; its length is fine. GTG. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:08, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Miriam Battista as crippled Minnie Ginsberg in Humoresque, 1920

  • It doesn't seem to be possible to definitively place the original photograph (by Hill) in 1920, much as I prefer how it looks, but this one in the article from Commons isn't bad, and as a Humoresque publicity still (where she's wearing the same costume as in other photos that can be placed on the movie set in 1920), should work. Too bad the tears aren't visible at 100x100, since the hook is about crying. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:34, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Images date should be corrected, it can not be 18 July 2012, 10:30:13 --TitoDutta 03:09, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
  • This seem to be the uncropped version of the image, but, god to go with AGF on the source as Rosiestep has said. --TitoDutta 04:45, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the tick for the new image. I do like that original image better, but as you noted initially, there's no date on it (or not one we can read), and without that, we can't be sure it's PD, can we? Too bad... BlueMoonset (talk) 05:16, 6 July 2013 (UTC)