Template:Did you know nominations/Mira Bellwether

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 17:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Mira Bellwether

(

)

... that Mira Bellwether's husband had already read her zine, Fucking Trans Women, years before he met her? Source: Holzer, Sloane (16 March 2023). "Mira Bellwether Fought for a World Where Trans Women Know Love and Pleasure". Them. Condé Nast. Retrieved 29 March 2023.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Goodwin Fire
- Comment: FTW previously ran in January, so I've used a hook primarily about Bellwether's personal life for variety.

Created by Tamzin (talk). Self-nominated at 03:18, 30 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Mira Bellwether; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: TERRIFIC read, so happy I decided to dive into this article for review! Copyvio Earwig check did come up with some high numbers, but they're all from direct quotes and I'm good with it here. Only note I have is that the hook says "years before he met her", but the sentence in the page only says "the first time he dated a trans woman" -- @Tamzin: I'm not withholding approval here because it's so close and very directly implied (and is also explicitly in the source for the sentence), but I think it would be good if you made it more explicit in the section. Really well done writing and great work! Nomader (talk) 13:51, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, Nomader! :) The article reads better with the detail in question anyways, so I've added it. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 18:24, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Also, just want to note, I had a moment's fear that the degree of (permissible) copying from the FTW article plus the degree of quoting would add up to less than 1,500 B of new readable prose (see DYKCRIT #1a/2a, DYKSG #A1/A2). So I checked. With the full article running 5,338 B as of this writing, the version with all copied sentences and quotes removed weighs in at a healthy 3,115. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 19:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)