The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 09:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Overall: All looks good - expanded more than 5x, good hook that is backed up in the referencing, well-sourced overall, meets length requirements, interesting. This is the first time I have reviewed a DYK. Please forgive me if I make a mistake! Netherzone (talk) 18:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)