Template:Did you know nominations/Mikhailovsky Garden

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Mikhailovsky Garden, Rossi Pavilion, Rossi Bridge

( Back to T:TDYK )

( Article history links:

)

Mikhailovsky Garden

... that Carlo Rossi designed a pavilion and a bridge for his development of the Mikhailovsky Garden (pictured)? Source: In Russian, examples [1], [2]

Reviewed: Christel Boom, Jason Fettig, 1875 Indianola hurricane
Comment: A variety of images of the garden, pavilion and bridge are also available.

Created by Spokoyni (talk). Self-nominated at 14:36, 5 August 2019 (UTC).

@Spokoyni: I will review these pages.epicgenius (talk) 14:21, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Mikhailovsky Garden:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: For such a short article, the lead is a bit long, but that's just my observation anyway.

Rossi Pavilion

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Rossi Bridge

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: epicgenius (talk) 14:21, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Overall,

I see no problems with any of the three articles, so i'm approving. epicgenius (talk) 14:22, 8 August 2019 (UTC)