Template:Did you know nominations/Microsoft v. Motorola
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 16:40, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Microsoft v. Motorola
[edit]- ... that an agreement with a standards organization to provide Reasonable and non-discriminatory licensing can be enforced by third parties?
Created by Rudydai (talk). Nominated by EricChuang676 (talk) at 04:37, 6 November 2013 (UTC).
- Please submit a proper hook that contains a link to the DYK candidate article. --70.31.9.174 (talk) 04:56, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
This nomination does not have a proper hook, the article was moved to article space on October 28 but wasn't nominated until nine days later on November 6, four days too late for DYK, and looking at the article, it's based on primary sources, with a single secondary source covering a sentence or two. (The nomination template was also incorrectly placed in the special occasion holding area, where it does not belong.) The late submission is enough to prevent approval, and the other issues are serious enough that there is no point in making an exception. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:40, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
