The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 01:56, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Comment: somehow, my content skills have returned? please do a notability sweep of the article :) i'm a bit concerned that it gets draftified or deleted.
Created by Theleekycauldron (talk). Self-nominated at 11:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC).
Overall: New enough (12 Dec) and long enough (RPS 4574), notability looks fine to me. Sourcing is good and Earwig looks good. Neutrality is good, maybe with exception of the last sentence or two of "Against", about canvassing with his mom (might read to some like a "gotcha" sort of line, but sentence after backs it up in a way). Happy to give a tick. (Not as important, but I'd recommend linking "Culver City" in the hook for unfamiliar readers.) PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the review, PCN02WPS! :) For the line in "against", are you reading it as in favour of or deriding Gourley? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 00:28, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
New enough (12 Dec) and long enough (RPS 4574), notability looks fine to me. Sourcing is good and Earwig looks good. Neutrality is good, maybe with exception of the last sentence or two of "Against", about canvassing with his mom (might read to some like a "gotcha" sort of line, but sentence after backs it up in a way). Happy to give a tick. (Not as important, but I'd recommend linking "Culver City" in the hook for unfamiliar readers.) PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)