Template:Did you know nominations/Mazurek v. Armstrong
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mazurek v. Armstrong
- ... that after the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Montana abortion law in Mazurek v. Armstrong, state courts struck down the law as a violation of the Montana Constitution? Source: "In 1997 the U.S. Supreme Court summarily upheld the law...The District Court granted, and later the Montana Supreme Court affirmed, an injunction barring enforcement of the statute." [1]. See also [2], [3], and [4]
- Reviewed: Exempt.
- Comment: The article was moved from draftspace to mainspace on 11 December. This is my first DYK nomination, so bear with me if I've committed some grievous faux pas or if the wording leaves something to be desired.
Moved to mainspace by Extraordinary Writ (talk). Self-nominated at 06:15, 12 December 2020 (UTC).
The article was moved to mainspace on the 11th, so it meets the new enough requirement. It is far, far above the 1500 characters requirement, so i'm not even going to check just how long it is. The hook is both long enough and interesting enough and is properly cited inline. The article looks to be within policy and a run through on Earwig's Copyvio Detector hasn't revealed any problems outside of actual direct quotes that are noted as such. And as a first submission, there is no need for a QPQ. Looks good to go. Great job! SilverserenC 23:25, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
