The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 07:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment: One of the books has no page numbers on Google Books. I was unable to find out more information on his other children partially due to many unavailable pages.
Created by SL93 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC).
Overall: Though no source was included in the nomination, I was able to verify the hook using the sources in the article. However, the quote is from an article written almost 20 years ago. Maybe clarify that at the time it was sold, the portrait was the second-most valuable artwork in Canada. (apart from this and the QPQ (which I assume is still in progress), this DYK seems good to go) GeneralPoxter (talk • contribs) 16:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
GeneralPoxter I already completed the QPQ (linked above). I am just waiting for that nominator to complete their QPQ for their nomination. ALT1 ... that a painting of Maungwudaus(pictured), an Ojibwe performer and herbalist, was the second-most valuable artwork in Canada at the time it was sold? SL93 (talk) 21:25, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Though no source was included in the nomination, I was able to verify the hook using the sources in the article. However, the quote is from an article written almost 20 years ago. Maybe clarify that at the time it was sold, the portrait was the second-most valuable artwork in Canada. (apart from this